Recently I have been asked in
different circles about the origin and meaning of
the Eiffel Tower. We may not deny the interest in such
a iron colossus dominating the Champ-de-Mars by the River
Seine. Quintessential symbol of Paris and a source of both
artistic and architectural discussions. What now
I expose is my humble opinion and therefore you
can accept it or not. Truth be told.
At mid-nineteenth
century a number of personalities begin to focus on the
architecture that looks to the future turning away the
reigning historicism in the Western world. We
could describe it as "Architecture of
Engineers" and among its favorite items would
be the use of iron as constructive
element. Previously The Industrial Revolution of the late Eighteenth Century and the early Nineteenth Century transforms the use of building
materials. New technologies allow the emergence
of a new aesthetic and typologies in
architecture.
Regarding the iron, metallurgical industry develops such that this metal is obteined in large amounts and higher quality and it allows its extensive use as in construction of bridges:
Iron Bridge, River Severn, Shropshire, England |
To all of this we must
add the development of the use of cement and later of reinforced concrete creating structures of buildings, formwork, etc... The use
of glass will also have its eruption but at the moment we will
not deal with this material.
To raise the Eiffel Tower it took the
development of the following changes in production (along with certain economic ups and downs, it is clear) roughly:
- Replacement of traditional techniques by
industrial ones. Development of the previous design: the
building is broken down into minimum modular units .
- Mass Production: Industrial production of these units through mechanized assembly lines.
- Construction and assembly
process for union of these prefabricated parts.
To all
these ingredients, we must add
a functionalist trend in architecture and the spread
of universal exhibitions, shop windows where
nations showed their charms.
I can not find a more appropriate analogy. I
can only think of the introduction of that series, The
Powerpuff Girls, that father who strives to pour into the
soup sweets, toysand and "everything nice" and "PUUUMMM" those
three imps arise. More or less like this, less
saturation and more chemistry came this:
Eiffel Tower, 1887-1889 |
Paris Universal Exhibition
of 1889, commemoration of first centenary of French Revolution.
Designer: Maurice Koechlin. Engineer: Gustave Eiffel.
Eiffel Tower was
built as a symbol of the Universal Exhibition of 1889. Other buildings
were erected for that, but they were demolished after
exhibition, unlucky fate that should have been shared by the
tower and (Nationalist reasons? Advertising motifs? Economic
reasons?) finally did not happen.
It is complete, it doesn't
lack any type of covering to conceal his iron structure,
precisely because the iron structure is the reason
for its existence. Eiffel was a
defender of using of new materials and
behold his strongest argument, a tower of iron made by assembled
modules in the same place of exhibition.
Its main
role (although the later history gave to it complex
tasks) was a symbol, gateway to the Universal
Exposition, as a triumphal arch up to 320 meters
high representing the majestic climax of the Nineteenth Century. To be seen and to see Paris. Pure engineering
propaganda surviving to itself. Criticized and praised
by each other, promoting a new aesthetic that turns
away to story.
Perhaps the most daring
idea to judge Eiffel Tower is its relation with
Impressionism. Eiffel Tower is Impressionist architecture.
France was the birthplace of this more or
less revolutionary movement (everyone place the turning
point anywhere) and in 1889 Monet, Caillebotte, Renoir had already
shake bourgeois consciences with their sudden and resolute brushstrokes.
Picture of Paris Universal Exhibition of 1889 |
Impressionism advocates
for "plein air". Tripod and oils go
out to paint the town, trains, bustle, bars, parties,
ports, smoke. Instantly captured glimpses. Eiffel Tower was built in just over two years,
meaningless time compared with other contemporary buildings (eg, Victor Emmanuel
II Monument, Rome, 1895-1911). In a impressionist painting the
canvas weave is not
hidden behind because motives expressed don't
need strong and opaque colors. Similarly the
viewer contemplates Eiffel Tower and his or her gaze
goes through it. He or she sees the blue sky or the gray
clouds. Air circulates between the structure, between
iron. The light alters the view of the
monument, as altered Monet vision in front
of Rouen Cathedral.
And that basically was Eiffel Tower at
the time of construction. Its functions have been
varied throughout the twentieth century, culminating in the
current economic heart of the french heritage. The
Tower undergoes continuous repair works and it is repainted every seven years to prevent
deterioration and we can not expect more
from what originally was an ambitious project of ephemeral
architecture.
John Ruskin must be turning in his grave (you have homework for this
week).
Gustave Eiffel caricature and the Tower |
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario